 |
Ethanol not as friendly as some say
21 August 2007 - By D.L. Salsbury - thekansan.com
Ethanol is not the viable, inexpensive, environmentally friendly
“alternative fuel” as claimed, because it is neither a substitute nor
a replacement for fossil fuels.
In fact, it squanders fossil fuels because it takes more energy from
fossil fuels to produce it than the energy it returns.
The demand for corn to produce ethanol has far-reaching consequences.
It is escalating the costs of consumer products across the board and
trickling down into the most unanticipated areas.
They range from the rising costs of beef, poultry and eggs because of
escalating feed costs, to Coca Cola and Pepsi because of the increase
price for corn syrup in their soft drinks.
I’ve even heard unconfirmed reports the cost of seed to the farmer may
increase as much as 30 percent.
| Comment: This is one of the
hidden reasons for ethanol conspired over the consumer. When these
connections are found, conspiracies are formed that create them,
as the system is all connected. |
Escalating consumer prices driven by the demand for corn is only
the tip of the iceberg. I obtained some figures from a friend who is a
high-level executive with an energy company that produces and markets
oil, natural gas and ethanol.
He confirmed my suspicions when he told me it takes more fossil fuel
energy (from natural gas) to distill a gallon of ethanol than the
energy it returns when burned as a fuel. Thus, we are squandering
fossil fuel energy just to produce it!
The negative yield as a fuel is further increased by the additional
consumption of fossil fuel (diesel/gasoline) required to plant,
harvest and transport the corn to the ethanol plant.
Ethanol activists will claim these costs are justified because ethanol
is an environmentally “friendly” alternative fuel.
Another scam! What their lobbyists are careful not to tell the
American public about ethanol production is these plants not only
consume a walloping volume of natural gas, they also consume
horrendous volumes of water in order to make the slurry for the
fermentation phase of the operation.
Even if processed sewer water is used, it is turned back into “sewer”
water after use and the spent slurry “sewer water” must then be
re-treated and disposed of in a safe manner that uses still more
energy.
My friend told me the water consumption and disposal alone limits the
location of ethanol plants to selected communities. And he works for a
company that has interests in ethanol plants! (He also said you can
make a lot of money with ethanol plants until the public catches on
and the bubble bursts!)
That’s not the end of it. The fermentation of huge quantities of corn
into ethanol also produces horrendous volumes of gasses, primarily
carbon dioxide. (If you don’t believe it, ask anyone who has had a
batch of home-brewed beer explode in the basement!)
Some may be harvested for industrial uses, but they can only sell so
much. Most of it is allowed to escape into the environment, and it
stinks!
Did I miss something here? Isn’t the reduction of carbon dioxide gas
escaping into the environment one of the arguments the
environmentalists use to lobby their “global warming” campaign?
How interesting — another case of two environmentalist movements,
contradictory to one another in effect, each creating more problems
than they are solving!
Now, here comes the really good part. Let’s get down to what it really
costs us at the pump. A few weeks ago, a local convenience store in
Marion was discounting “super unleaded” (with 10 percent ethanol) as
much as 8 cents per gallon less than “regular unleaded”. To the
ordinary consumer, ethanol fuels appear to be more economical than the
“bad” unleaded gas obtained from pure petroleum.
Again, part of the scam! What they don’t tell us is it takes
roughly six gallons of ethanol to produce the same amount of energy
contained in a single gallon of unleaded gasoline. Oh, oh! Let’s do
the math.
If we buy 60 gallons of “regular unleaded” at the pump (recently
priced at $3.03 per gallon), it’s going to cost us $181.80. The same
60 gallons of discounted “super unleaded” with 10 percent ethanol was
priced at $2.95 per gallon.
Thus, the ethanol gas will only cost us $177, for a perceived
“savings” of $4.80.
But, the ethanol gas actually is costing us more than the regular
unleaded. Those 60 gallons of “super unleaded” contain a full six
gallons of ethanol.
But remember, six gallons of ethanol is only worth about one gallon of
regular unleaded. So, in terms of the actual “energy” we are buying,
60 gallons of 10 percent ethanol gas is only equivalent to 55 gallons
of regular unleaded gas.
Now, if we calculate the actual price of super unleaded based on its
total energy potential, it is actually costing us a whopping $3.22 per
gallon! That’s actually 19 cents a gallon more than regular unleaded
gas in terms of the energy we’re putting in the tank.
In addition, that 10 percent ethanol in your fuel decreases your
mileage by as much as 7 percent to 8 percent.
Kind of plays with your head, doesn’t it?
D.L. Salsbury, who is a veterinarian, resides in Hillsboro.
|