 |
Fluoride Accumulates in Pineal Gland
30 December 2006 - From Healthy News Service
Fluoride, added to the water supply of many cities and
counties and sold by WalMart in its nursery water, has a tendency to
accumulate not only in developing teeth causing discoloration, and in
bones making them brittle. The mineral is associated with cancer and
it also accumulates in the pineal gland, an important hormone control
center, where it wreaks considerable havoc. Paul Connett of Fluoride
Action Network comments on Jennifer Luke's research which was part of
her PhD thesis and had just been published in Caries Research under
the title: Fluoride Deposition in the Aged Human Pineal Gland.
| Fluoride is a poison, yet we add it to our water
and toothpaste and even call it a supplement, although it has no
nutritional value. Its medicinal value - the prevention of tooth
decay - is the official explanation for adding the toxic mineral
to the water supply. But that value is far outweighed by its toxic
side effects - amply documented by Paul Connett in his Statement
of Concern |

Photo Credit: healthy.net
View: Bottled Water pH Levels |
Recent European Union legislation on food supplements lists fluoride
as an essential element to offer for supplementation. This is somewhat
ironic when contrasted with the European legislators' feigned concern
over the putative toxicity of vitamins and their efforts to limit
dosages of these vital nutrients in order to "protect public health".
We also use fluoride in many household items, such as non-stick frying
pans, high-tech water repellent fabrics and others. Recently, at least
some timid attempts to start assessing the disease burden caused by
fluoride are under way. The Journal of Water Health carries an article
on this research. Meanwhile in the US, the FDA has decided that
fluoride should be allowed in bottled water, perhaps in deference to
WalMart's offerings.
The use of fluoride for "health" reasons is one of the great
insanities of our times. Could it be just by chance that the Germans
and Russians both used fluoride to make prisoners stupid and docile or
that the US government faced legal action over the toxic effects in
the environment of this nuclear waste by-product?
Perhaps the push for 'enriching' our water and our foods with fluoride
has some ulterior motive that has little to do with health. Be that as
it may, the campaign for fluoridation is still in full swing and
health authorities are pushing the poison as if their monthly
paychecks depended on it. Jennifer Luke's PhD thesis on fluoride and
its accumulation in the pineal gland - Paul Connett says that research
might just be the scientific straw that breaks the camel's back:
Fluoride & the Pineal Gland: Study Published in Caries Research
The wheels of science grind very slowly. Finally, the first half of
the work that was the subject of Jennifer Luke's Ph.D. thesis;
presentation in Bellingham, Washington (ISFR conference) in 1998 and a
videotaped interview I had with her (see www.fluoridealert.org/videos.htm),
has been published in Caries Research.
In my view this work is of enormous importance and could be (or should
be) the scientific straw that breaks the camel's back of fluoridation.
When Luke found out that the pineal gland - a little gland in the
center of the brain, responsible for a very large range of regulating
activities (it produces serotonin and melatonin) - was also a
calcifying tissue, like the teeth and the bones, she hypothesized it
would concentrate fluoride to very high levels. The gland is not
protected by the blood brain barrier and has a very high perfusion
rate of blood, second only to the kidney.
Luke had 11 cadavers analyzed in the UK. As she predicted she found
astronomically high levels of fluoride in the calcium hydroxy apatite
crystals produced by the gland. The average was 9000 ppm and went as
high as 21,000 in one case. These levels are at, or higher, than
fluoride levels in the bones of people suffering from skeletal
fluorosis. It is these findings which have just been published.
It is the ramifications of these findings which have yet to be
published. In the second half of her work she treated animals
(Mongolian gerbils) with fluoride at a crack pineal gland research
unit at the University of Surrey, UK (so there is no question about
the quality of this work). She found that melatonin production (as
measured by the concentration of a melatonin metabolite in the urine)
was lower in the animals treated with high fluoride levels compared
with those treated with low levels. Luke hypothesizes that one of the
four enzymes needed to convert the amino acid tryptophan (from the
diet) into melatonin is being inhibited by fluoride. It could be one
of the two enzymes which convert tryptophan to serotonin or one of the
two which convert serotonin to melatonin.
Significance? Huge. Melatonin is responsible for regulating all kinds
of activities and there is a vast amount of work investigating its
possible roles in aging, cancer and many other life processes. The one
activity that Luke is particularly interested in is the onset of
puberty. The highest levels of melatonin ( produced only at night) is
generated in young children. It is thought that it is the fall of
these melatonin levels which acts like a biological clock and triggers
the onset of puberty. In her gerbil study she found that the high
fluoride treated animals were reaching puberty earlier than the low
fluoride ones.
We know from recent studies - and considerable press coverage - that
young girls are reaching puberty earlier and earlier in the US. Luke
is not saying that fluoride (or fluoridation) is the cause but her
work waves a very worrying red flag. Fluoride's role in earlier
puberty needs more thorough investigation. Of an interesting
historical note, in the Newburgh versus Kingston fluoridation trial
(1945-1955), it was found that the girls in fluoridated Newburgh were
reaching menstruation, on average, five months earlier than the girls
in unfluoridated Kingston, but the result was not thought to be
significant at the time (Schlessinger et al, 1956).When one considers
the seriousness of a possible interference by fluoride on a growing
child's pineal gland (and for that matter, elderly pineal glands) it
underlines the recklessness of fluoridation. The precautionary
principle would say, as would basic common sense, that you don't take
these kind of risks with our children for a benefit which, at best,
amounts to 0.6 tooth surfaces out of 128 tooth surfaces in a child's
mouth (Brunelle and Carlos, 1990, Table 6).
I have a copy of Luke's Ph.D. thesis and would be willing to share it
with those who have a serious scientific interest in this issue. The
other references cited above can be found in my Statement of Concern
which is published on the FAN webpage:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-statement.htm
Paul Connett
Provided by Health Supreme - Sepp Hasslberger on
12/30/2006
References:
Fluoride: Friend or Foe?
Germans and Russians used Fluoride to make prisoners 'stupid and
docile'
The Fluoride Deception: How a Nuclear Waste ByProduct Made its
Way into Nation's Drinking Water |